When Labels Lie: Lipstick On Modernist Pig Again!

 

The conservative Novus Ordo presider endowed with the Modernist "governing spirit" insisting his audience call the Modernist ecumenical service "Mass"... A call for lipstick smearing exercise!   

Preamble:

I stumbled on a clip in which a conservative Nigerian Novus Ordo "Bishop" urges his audience not to confuse their language. In their speech they say "after church service"...  he insists: 

"you are a Catholic for goodness sake, "after Mass " "after the Eucharistic celebration", "it is not just service, it is worship, it is sacrifice , it is communion, all of them put together, what we celebrate everyday and especially every Sunday on the altar ". "After the Mass... 

These are nice words. But here’s the truth:

•  What he calls a “Mass” is not the traditional Catholic Mass.
•  What he defends is a new liturgy made in the 1960s—called the Novus Ordo Missae, or “New Order of Mass.”

 Dressing it up with Catholic words is like putting lipstick on a pig. It doesn’t change the animal underneath.

The theme of this post has been addressed in a number of previous posts, particularly "The Devil's Strategy And Eucharistic Piety In Eccumenical Mess"  and THE ‘ONAGA’ DEPRESSING COMEDY: A RIDICULOUS ATTEMPT TO BAN PROTESTANTISM FROM A PROTESTANT PUDDING!

Here again we want to show clearly how the Novus Ordo is not the true Catholic Mass, but an ecumenical man-made service. We hope to leave no stone unturned.

What Is the Mass?

The Mass is the unbloody sacrifice of the body and blood of Christ. In the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass:

 “One and the same Christ… is offered in an unbloody manner by the ministry of priests  —Council of Trent, Session 22, Chapter 2 (1562)

That means:

• The same Jesus Who died on the Cross is offered on the altar.
• The priest, not the people, offers Him to God the Father.
• This is not just a “meal” or “gathering,” but a true sacrifice—the greatest act of worship on earth.

The Traditional Catholic Mass reflects this clearly:

• It is full of reverence, silence, kneeling, incense, and awe.
• The priest faces God, not the people.
• The language is sacred, not casual.
• The altar is Calvary. The Host is the Lamb.

The six protestant pastors "outside the walls" with the then grandmaster of the Modernist revolutionists, "Paul VI", who assisted in concocting the ecumenical service falsely called the new order of Mass: they made sure it was an ecumenical service... 

 What Is the Novus Ordo?

The so-called “Novus Ordo Missae” -i.e. "New order of the Mass” was invented in 1969 by a Modernist committee with the help of six Protestant pastors and promulgated by the then modernist Papal Impostor, Paul VI. This is not a conspiracy theory—it is openly documented. 

“The reform of the liturgy was carried out with the help of Protestant advisors.” —Michael Davies, Pope Paul’s New Mass, p. 500 

“We must strip from our Catholic prayers and from the Catholic liturgy everything which can be the shadow of a stumbling-block for our separated brethren.” —Annibale Bugnini, quoted in Notitiae, April 1974, p. 138

That means the Mass was changed to please Protestants, not God.

Even Modernist Papal Impostor Pope Paul VI admitted it was something new.

In his pretended General Audience, November 26, 1969, while speaking about “changes in Mass for greater apostolate” - by which we must understand greater ecumenical apostolate: 

• He uses the term “new rite of the Mass” explicitly, underscoring that this is not a minor translation but a substantial liturgical innovation.
• He acknowledges the “astonishing” and “extraordinary” nature of changes to a centuries-old tradition, confirming this was meant to mark a turning point—a new epoch—in how Catholics worship.
• He emphasizes the active participation of the assembly of the faithful—a hallmark of the post-Vatican II liturgical vision.

 “We must prepare for this many-sided inconvenience. It is the kind of upset caused by every novelty… we are giving up the Latin language… we are introducing changes into venerable rites.” —Paul VI, General Audience, November 26, 1969

One point is clear: this “new Mass” is not just a translation. It is a man-made service, ecumenical in design and modernist in spirit.

Yes, the so-called "New Mass" is not Catholic in form, intention, or theology. It is a Modernist, ecumenical construction—not the unbroken worship of the Roman Church.

Changing the Words Doesn’t Change the Reality. Or does it? 

Undoubtedly, Modernists love to change labels:

• For Catholic “Sacrifice” they use “Celebration” 
• For “Priest” they introduced “Presider”
• For “Mass” they opted for “Eucharistic Assembly”
• For “Faithful” they opted for “Community/Participants”
• For “Altar” they co-opted “Table”

So when a Modernist bishop, however conservative, insists you say “after the Mass” instead of “after service”—but still uses the Novus Ordo—he’s just putting lipstick on a pig.

•  Changing the frame doesn't change the picture.
• Putting gold thread on a sack doesn’t make it royal.
• A pig in makeup is still not a lamb.

 A “New” Mass With Protestant Thinking

The first version of the Novus Ordo General Instruction (1969) described it like this:

The Lord’s Supper or Mass is the sacred assembly or meeting of the People of God, gathered together with a priest presiding, to celebrate the memorial of the Lord.” —General Instruction of the Roman Missal, 1969, §7 (first edition)

Notice:

• No mention of sacrifice.
• No mention of Calvary.
• No mention of the priest offering Christ to the Father.

This is Protestant theology.

The Council of Trent declared:

 “If anyone says that the Mass is only a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving... and not a propitiatory sacrifice... let him be anathema.” —Council of Trent, Session 22, Canon 3

So the new Mass contradicts the infallible teaching of the Church. That’s not a valid “reform”—that’s a revolution, and the key players in it knew and willed it to be just so.

 Can We “Fix” the Novus Ordo with Incense and Latin?

Those of conservative bent in the Modernist synodal, ecumenical, Pan-Reilgious impostor church occupying Catholic buildings try to make the Novus Ordo “reverent”:

• They add Latin
• They face East
• They use incense
• They add Gregorian chant here and there. 

But, you see? no matter how much you dress it up, it still lacks:

• The clear language of sacrifice
• The priest’s true mediation
• The unambiguous doctrine of the Roman Rite.
• It remains a concocted rite made with ecumenical intent.

Here we must recall the testimony of Cardinal Ottaviani, head of the Holy Office under Pius XII: 

 “The Novus Ordo represents, as a whole and in detail, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated at the Council of Trent.” —Ottaviani Intervention (1969)

So? Again, lipstick on a pig. Not a lamb. Not the Mass.

What To Do As A Catholic?

Scripture tells us:

Go out from among them, be separate… do not touch what is unclean.” —2 Corinthians 6:17

 If there be anyone with an informed Catholic common sense in the audience of this ultra-misleading conservative modernist "Bishop", such would know that a Catholic: 

• Won't try to fix the Novus Ordo. 
• Won't  call it “the Mass” when it isn’t. 
• Would reject it for what it is: a Modernist ecumenical service

A Catholic once fooled by conservative Modernists to believe the ecumenical service is "Catholic Mass", on being better informed, would seek out, and return to, the Traditional Catholic Mass:

• the Mass of the Saints,
• the Mass of Trent,
• the Mass of St . Pius V and St. Gregory the Great,
• the Mass that formed martyrs and missionaries.

It must be noted that what is advocated for is not a nostalgic attachment to what the Modernists call "the extraordinary Form of the Mass" offered in union with the Modernist ecclesiastical intruders. Jumping on the bandwagon of the brood of Latin-massists is off the point. 

It must be a return to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass entirely free of any connection to the reforms, innovations, or individuals whose motives and ideologies are rooted in Modernism, condemned by the Church as "the synthesis of all heresies". 

Summing Up: 

The good intentions of the Modernist conservative governor have the wherewithal for fooling the gullible. But the crisis today is not about what we call it. It’s about what it is.

Yes. The what is at stake is not a question of terminology but of theological rupture. No amount of traditional language can repair a liturgical structure built on Modernist principles. To call the Novus Ordo “the Mass” does not make it so, for the substance is lacking.

 “Lex orandi, lex credendi.”

• As we worship, so shall we believe.
• If we worship falsely, we end up believing falsely.

Lipstick should in no way be smeared on a Modernist ecumenical pig, an ecumenical service, and pretend it is Catholic Holy Mass.  To do so is to mislead souls, weaken faith, and obscure the true Sacrifice.

To those who have been victims of this conservative modernist foolery, I entreat you, I encourage you, I charge you:

•  Flee the Modernist pig smeared with  Catholic lipstick.
• Return to the Lamb.
• Return to the true Roman Mass untouched by the impious hands of the Modernist liturgical revolutionists.