UNIVERSAL PEACEFUL ACCEPTANCE… OR UNIVERSAL PEACEFUL CONFUSION?
Can the Church publicly promote what earlier Catholicism condemned and still claim the guidance of the Holy Ghost? Prologue: Pentecost, the Spirit of Truth, and the Real Battlefield I posted a short Pentecost message on X as a tag on two screenshots. It reads: “Think on it! Only ‘sedevacantism’ testifies to The Spirit of Truth Who is the Infallible Guide of the Church… No compromise. Simply Catholic. A blessed Pentecost to you!” Before the end of the day came a sophisticated-looking response : a flowchart defending the post-conciliar hierarchy through an appeal to: universalis pacifica adhaesio (“universal peaceful acceptance”) Attached to the chart is the punchy, and triumphal question: As a Sedevacantist, did Billot, Franzelin, and John of St. Thomas, writing centuries after Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, teach Universal Peaceful Acceptance as a reliable theological principle despite Cum Ex? If so, by what traditional authority do you claim Cum ...