Sede-Privationism, If You Must?
Prologue: When Necessity Calls To Duty A screenshot was attached to a comment on my post on X with the request that requires consideration of Cardinal Manning, the Fathers, and the Limits of Analogy: “What do you say to this? The author is an ex-seminarian of MHTS. It seems to match what Cardinal Manning writes (based on the Church Fathers) in "The Present Crisis of the Holy See"; that as Christ went through His passion, death & resurrection, His Church must also.” Below is the text extracted from the screenshot: Quote from: 2Vermont on January 27, 2021, 09:31:13 AM What is your position then? I am not so sure history will not prove us all incorrect, at least in some respect or other. If I HAVE to align with some take or other, the one that makes the most sense to me is Sede-privationism, or the Cassiciacum Thesis of Guérard des Lauriers (who, aside from Fr. Stepanich OFM, was the only legit theologian in Traddieland). Pure sv-ism has unsolvable issues, as does r&...
.webp)

