They Have No Prince

 

Pope Pius XII: after whose death Modernists rallied themselves saying of uncompromising Catholics "they have no prince, nor anyone to help them. Let us...take away the memory of them from amongst men"

Preamble

Today is October 26th, 2023: the 65th anniversary of the mysterious conclave of 1958. 

Now, a week ago, while going about my devotional exercise of meditation on the excerpts from First Maccabees meant for the Third Thursday of October, I came across some thought provoking verses of the day: 1 Macc. 12:53 & 54; which  took my mind to the events leading to the conclave of 1958 and an embarrassing and scandalous reality to-day. These thought provoking verses read thus:

" Then all the heathens that were round about them, sought to destroy them. For they said: They have no prince, nor any to help them: now therefore, let us make war upon them, and take away the memory of them from amongst men"

The thinking of "heathens" in 1958

Most certainly, anyone with an informed Catholic Common Sense today will conceive no doubt as to what was the thinking of those ("heathens") described by Pope St. Pious X of "the most pernicious of the adversaries of the Church" -the Modernists, after the death of Pope Pius XII.

Bent on transforming modern Catholicism "into a non-dogmatic Christianity; that is to say, into a broad and liberal Protestantism" (the 65th condemned proposition of the Modernists), and using their choicest strategy -duplicity- to infiltrate Catholic sacristies, seminaries, chanceries, etc, they could say on the occasion of the demise of Pope Pius XII concerning uncompromising Catholics of the time: 

 "They have no prince, nor any to help them: now therefore, let us make war upon them, and take away the memory of them from amongst men". 

Yes, a leading figure from that execrable sect, a Dom Lambert Beauduin, affirmed without mincing words 

 "If they elect Roncalli, all will be saved. He will be capable of calling a council and canonizing ecumenism… I believe we have a good chance. Most of the Cardinals are not sure of what to do. They are capable of voting for him" (Quoted in Anthony CEKADA, Work of Human Hands, (West Chester, OH: SGG Resources, 2015), 15-16)

The "War" Strategy.

So, the Modernist knew exactly what they wanted: one from their ranks, Roncalli, capable of calling a council and of canonizing ecumenism -condemned under the name of pan-christianity in Pope Pius XI's "Mortalium Animos", the fruit of indifferentism condemned several times by different Popes more than a century: Gregory XVI, (1832); Pius IX (1854, 1863, 1864); Leo XIII (1885) St. Pius X (1907); and Pius XI [See Denz. 1613f, 1642, 1646f, 1677f, 1687, 1715ff, 1779, 1868, 2082ff., 2199]. 

Then came the mysterious conclave of 1958: on the 26th of October, there was white smoke, but no Pope came out; and, two days later, October 28, 1958, Roncalli emerged as "Pope John XXIII". 

So? The primordial war strategy of the "heathens", the Modernists, was usurpation of the Papal seat for Roncalli whom they knew was capable of calling a council and canonizing ecumenism; this, of course, has everything to do with the plan of the synagogue of Satan, whose ready agents Modernists are, to use the structure of the Catholic Church and carry out a "revolution in tiara and cope"  with the "little finger" of a 'pope' involved in the plot...

And, not long after the fact of the usurpation what did he, Roncalli-then-turned-John XXIII, announce to the world? His "sudden inspiration" to call an ecumenical council, of course! And what was the topmost item on the agenda? "Christian unity", i.e. ecumenism! And, this was solemnly promulgated by his hand-picked successor in the plot, a fellow die-hard ecumenist, Montini… And, ever since he, Roncalli, set the revolutionary ecumenical stone rolling, we know what has been the touchstone for all Modernist endeavors, don't we? 

Some see a legally designated Modernist material Pope and Modernist material cardinals legally appointed by a legally designated Modernist material Pope by virtue of the exercise of his ordinary jurisdiction; manifesting their lack of "objective intention" to will the good of the Church... Informed Catholic common sense sees manifest Modernist heretics and pan-religioninsts, ecclesiastical intruders, without their deceptive mask, overtly promoting  the mystery of iniquity... 

An Embarrassing and Scandalous Reality To-day 

Now, to-day some would have us believe that:

• Modernist electors, as Modernist electors, who may be in principle "phony cardinals" are not in anyway "phony electors", and that they "intend to designate someone legally to receive the papacy", so as to perpetuate the "material-legal structure" of the Catholic Church. 
• A Modernist thus "legally designated" to receive the papacy, while due to the lack of some "objective intention to will the good of the Church" is merely 'Pope materially not formally', in his turn however, "intend to nominate subjects to have the faculty or right of designating a Pope when he nominates cardinals.
• A Modernist material pope has the "ordinary jurisdiction "to designate electors and even bishops for the purpose of succeeding to the sees of authority , and even to validly change the rules of election".
• That therefore Modernist conclaves "intend the good of succession to the papacy objectively and those whose are elected to this see objectively intend the good of naming electors of the Pope.
• This "mere material continuity of authority is able to continue indefinitely…" 

Behold the newest Modernist material (phony) Cardinal who, we are told, would exercise their right someday together with their comrades in the material cardinalate, as legitimate Cardinal electors to designate someone (from their ranks of course) to legally receive the Papacy (materially)... 
Catholic Common Sense laments:
Undisputed: “operation follows being”, the best duly do teach. Sadly, “phony cardinals but not phony electors” they also preach. What scandal, the best, such a conclusion reach?! 

Now, an informed Catholic Common Sense wonders: 

• We know that action flows from being -"operation follows being":   if in principle Modernist cardinals may be "phony" in their being "Cardinals", how is it that their pretended action as "electors" escapes being "phony"? 
• So, Modernist electors will the good of the Church by intending the good of succession to the papacy objectively, while one from among their ranks thus objectively elevated turns around objectively not willing the good of the Church on the one hand, and wills the good of the Church on the other hand by nominating electors who can legally designate someone else after him who will also continue the trend: objectively willing the good of succession but objectively not willing the good of the Church? What a vicious cycle! 
• Meanwhile, how could Modernist usurpation, made possible by a diabolical infiltration contrived in the synagogue of Satan, by any means be intended to perpetuate the material-legal structure of Traditional Catholicism for the the good of Traditional Catholicism whose memory they want extirpated from among men?" 
• "What "legality?" "Apostate legality to the rescue of Apostolic legality?" "What participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness?" (2 Corinthians 6:15). 

Should not an informed Catholic Common Sense blush for shame in the face of these considerations? 

Some see a Modernist material Pope exercising his ordinary jurisdiction to designate a material cardinal vested with the right or authority to designate someone legally to receive the papacy materially so as to perpetuate the "material-legal structure" of the Church, thus willing the good of material-legal succession... Informed Catholic Common Sense sees Modernist impostors at their best in their hypocrisy... 

Summing Up

Some may refuse to see the embarrassment and scandal underlined in the analysis of the reality of our times enshrined herein. Others still may refuse to see how thought-provoking our preoccupation is. 

Such is not surprising in an epoch when men have no love of the truth. 

Be that as it may, the Modernist impostors, unflinching in their determination to de-Catholicise the world hem uncompromising Catholics in today from all sides with calumnies and character assassination as to strip them of any vestiges of believability. But you see? None of this escapes the All-Wise Providence: our Lord and Master, Truth itself, was accused, outraged, mocked, and crucified; and He said it will always be the same for His  followers. Meanwhile, the light of the True Faith is still burning despite their concerted efforts to extinguish it, and "men of good will" are being led to discover it. 

The truth of the matter remains that any manifest Modernist, whosoever, occupying de facto a place of authority and presenting himself as holding a place legally in the Catholic hierarchy is but an impostor having absolutely nothing to lose. Catholic Apostolicity needs no aid from Modernist apostate material-legal apostolicity for it's perpetuation and unbroken succession. 

You see? "we walk by faith and not by sight" (2 Cor. 5:7) and we know without any iota of doubt that "The gates of hell shall not prevail" (Matt. 16:18) 

By sight, everyone sees some individuals De Facto occupying places of authority (as Pope, Cardinals, Bishops...), and carrying our pope-like, cardinal-like, bishop-like actions.  But by faith, we know that these de jure are phony and are impostors and ecclesiastical intruders at the service of the "mystery of iniquity" set against "the mystery of faith". 

Yes, since the death of Pope Pius XII we have had no Pope de jure simply so. But we are not without hope. We are are Pope-less. But we are not hopeless. Blessed be God ordering all things sweetly for His Honor and Glory and for our sanctification through Mary Immaculate, Mother of Divine Providence!