Christ the King?

Christ the King:
outrightly denied and rejected by modernists
and their lay-robed agents,
but hypocritically celebrated... 

In a chat today, someone asked me "How was the solemnity of Christ the universal King Last Sunday?"  by this he was referring to the caricature of that solemn feast staged by the modernist impostors on their so-called "34th Sunday in Ordinary Time" -which was this past Sunday [20th November 2022].  

        Being a victim of the hypocrisy of the modernist impostors and their agents -lay-robbed men; this fellow does not know that according to the unchanged Traditional Catholic Liturgical Calendar, the Feast of Christ the King is celebrated on the last Sunday of October -the Sunday which immediately precedes the Feast of All Saints [so as to set "the crowning glory upon the mysteries of the life of Christ already commemorated during the year, and before celebrating the triumph of all the Saints" -see Quas Primas, n.29] I explained briefly how the agents of the religion he mistakes for the Catholic Religion could only celebrate a "solemnity of Christ the King" out of sheer hypocrisy, since the denial of the Kingship of Christ is at the foundation of their impostor religion, and that God is not mocked by this utter hypocrisy...  

Now, according to the mind of the Catholic Church, the liturgical feast of Christ the King emphasizes both Christ's spiritual rule over all men and his supreme social sovereignty over princes and peoples. 

In establishing this feast in1925, Pope Pius XI explained that the title and power of king belongs to Christ as Man in the strict sense. Thus, he decried the different fruits of anti-clericalism boldly pushed by the enemies of the Church [see Quas Primas, n.24.]: 

• rejection of the empire of Christ over all nations. 
• the denial of the right which the Church has from Christ Himself to teach all mankind, to make laws, to govern peoples in all that that pertains to their salvation. 
• likening the Religion of Christ to false religions and being put on equal level with them.
• wanting to dispense with God and demanding that religion consist in impiety and neglect of God.
• wishing to set up a natural religion consisting in some instinctive affection of the heart -i.e. religious sense. 

Pope Pius XI explained a threefold power which is essential to lordship of Christ as the King of kings [see Quas Primas, n.14]: 

• Christ as "a law-giver, to whom obedience is due"; 
• His judicial power, in which is "included the right of rewarding and punishing all men living, for this right is inseparable from that of judging". 
• His Executive power, on account of which "all must obey his commands; none may escape them, nor the sanctions he has imposed." 

Now, modernists today and their agents, manifest themselves to be well schooled in that indifferentism which is the spirit of the anti-clericalism whose odious fruits Pope Pius XI denounced as noted earlier: 

• they promote that pan-Christianity condemned by the Church as tantamount to apostasy - the pan-Christianity styled 'ecumenism'.
• to promote this pan-Christianity, they insist on a 'dialogue on equal footing' between Catholics and Protestants.
• likening the Religion of Christ to false religions and putting it on equal level with them, they promote inter-religious dialogue and inter-faith prayers.
• wishing to set up a natural religion consisting in some instinctive affection of the heart -i.e. religious sense, they promote false religious liberty which presupposes that all religions are more or less good and efficiently useful unto salvation, another condemned heresy. 
• this false religious liberty ultimately dispenses with God and give the license to impiety; demanding the neglect of God and His rights.    

Who does not see in all these an outright rejection of the empire of Christ the King over all nations? Here we clearly listen to the sad re-echo of the voices of the children of that race once the chosen people of God: "we have no king but Caeser"! as they solemnly and publicly rejected Christ's Kingship.

Please, tell, how could these same modernists and their lay-robed agents celebrate a "Solemnity of Christ the universal King" if not by sheer hypocrisy? Or would someone dare to plead ignorance on their part? Certainly, it could not be of that species of ignorance styled "invincible"... oops! 

As a matter of fact, no one who truly professes Christ to be King of kings could knowingly promote things which presupposes the denial of the very same Kingship. Any appeal to a "hermeneutics of continuity" between such a profession and acts contrary to it only establishes the underlying malice the more. 

God is not mocked! 

O that the poor victims of the modernist hypnosis inducing hypocrisy, [like the fellow whose question occasioned this post] would give heed to the sweet whispers of Providence made available to them through the testimony of the uncompromising Catholic remnant!  Kyrie eleison, Christe eleison, Kyrie eleison!